Arizona is a common property state, so if you buy during the wedding goods that are not an inheritance or gift, it belongs to each of you. While some states require that real estate service be completely equal, Arizona law does not. However, it must be fair and, as a general rule, end in much the same way. Another problem in which they can help you is the distinction between separate and marital property, as this is not always smooth with divorces. With a complex situation regarding your wealth and property, you will be better off talking to a legal expert who can help. If, subsequently, one party claims to have been forced or forced to sign the agreement, to have been mentally incompetent, not to have had sufficient time to verify, not to have understood, these issues are often classic situations in which one judge hears evidence in which one spouse says the agreement should be annulled and the other spouse argues that the agreement should be respected. Both parties have the motive to lie (or stretch the truth – or to live a comfortable memory or rewrite history) and the judge will therefore probably be skeptical about the testimony of both parties. Although not necessary, marital agreements should also be signed by a lawyer on each side. Bluntly a groom would be the main person who benefits the bride with a lawyer, and visa-versa. I recommend to my clients who are involved in marriage contracts to have a lawyer on both sides, so that the other party can no longer claim to have not understood what she signed. Good lawyers will endeavour to preserve, in the later case, in the later case, evidence that both parties were indeed legally competent to enter into the marriage agreement. If you or your friends or family members are engaged or are about to commit, and you have found that you need experienced legal representation, call 480-733-6800 to speak to Douglas C.
Gardner or visit our website at www.yourarizonadivorcelawyer.com. Case law and legislation are being developed with respect to the validity and applicability of post-up agreements. There are some variations from state to state, so it is very important for couples to review the laws of their state before entering. The factors that suggest applicability would be that the negotiation process is not imposed, that full financial disclosure has been made and that the parties each have a separate audit service. In addition, a very important factor in maintaining the validity of a post-uptial agreement is that a contractor is not secretly motivated to improve the conditions of an (immediate) divorce. The marriage agreement stipulates that after the divorce, the woman will lose all her shares in the phoenix house ($1.4 million market value) and instead collect the Tucson matrimonial dwelling ($1.0 million market value). If the Prenup is forced, the wife gets a common value of $400,000 less than the husband receives.